![]() In a recent review, Scott Wasson at the always-thorough Tech Report presented a slew of benchmarks that included both of these processors. These 2.4 GHz CPUs are identical in every respect, except for the number of cores they bring to the table. To get a sense of what kind of performance improvement we can expect going from 2 to 4 CPU cores, let's focus on the Core 2 Duo E6600 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 processors. In Quad-Core Desktops and Diminishing Returns, I questioned how effectively today's software can really use even four CPU cores, much less the inevitable eight and sixteen CPU cores we'll see a few years from now. But for most software, you hit a point of diminishing returns very rapidly after two cores. It's like having a backup CPU in reserve, waiting to jump in and assist as necessary. If nothing else, it lets you gracefully terminate an application that has gone haywire, consuming all available CPU time. I think there's a clear and substantial benefit for all computer users when there are two CPUs waiting to service requests, instead of just one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |